>
SRF Walrus
Mt. Washington, Ca
Open discussions about SRF
Gold Community SRF Walrus
    > Letters to the Editor (cleared of identification!)
        > Information on the AY requested
New Topic    Add Reply

Next Topic >>
Author Comment
srfwalrus
ezOP
(10/27/03 5:41 am)
Reply
Information on the AY requested
The following was received from an Italian email address in October 2003.
Quote:

Dear devotees running the walrus,

Is there a historical study about the "Autobiography of a Yogi" in your website? I didn't find one. I think it might be quite interesting for many of your readers to know how the it developed over the years. A scientific study, so to speak.

Like:
An introduction: Describing Yogananda's work of 25 years writing it....
Then:
:) In 1946 it was first published by the Philosophical Library in New York....
:) SRF acquired the copyrights in 1956. That was the year when SRF, for the first time, printed it. It was the 7th edition. Still they spelled Yogananda's title as Paramhansa.... etc.
:) In 1958, for the 8th edition, the following changes were made: Paramhansa to Paramahansa, and.....
:) Lahiri and Babaji appeared with a dressed (instead of bare) chest in the ... edition.
:) In 19.. , pictures of Daya Mata and Rajarsi were included.... Other pictures were added....or taken out...
:) In 1997 SRF/YSS re-published the original 1946 version in India.
:) Comparing the 1946 and 2002 editions, we find that.....

There are many quite knowledgeable people visiting your site, so maybe they could work together? Everyone adds some pieces of information, in the end we'll have a great study. There could be a link to the original AY, as well as to subsequent editions, if people have them and want to
post them on the internet.

What do you think?

Joy,
(email address from Italy, October 2003)

ranger20
Registered User
(10/27/03 9:23 am)
Reply
Re: Information on the AY requested
Tracking the changes in the AY has become a subject of profound interest for me, because it really represents an attempt to drill down and discern which words are Master's and which are not. I have the first edition (Ananda) and the current edition, and the 8th edition. I have the 7th edition on the way from an online used book source. I'd love to find one of the later Philosophical Library editions.

I've come upon so many changes I don't know how a group of part time posters, without access to the different texts could track them. I plan to note a few, and perhaps we can just start a topic on changes to the AY, and write to it on an informal basis.

In addition to some of the major changes that have been observed (eg, deletion of World Brotherhood Colonies as an SRF goal), I'm coming across seemingly minor chages that, taken individually, just appear kind of silly, but taken together, show a significant drift in the way we, and future generations will be able to perceive Master. For example (and I do not have the texts with me):

- Sometime after the 8th edition, the sentence in the Tiger Swami chapter, describing tigers as having "blood lust," was removed. (So PY would not use the word "lust?)

- Sometime after the 1st edition, in the "Blissful Devotee" chapter, the day after Master Mahashaya's "bioscope," PY describes himself with a word like "bereft" that he could not get back to that ecstatic experience. (Someone decided that Master shouldn't feel sad?)

- There's a footnote pointing to a bible passage in Matthew, in the chapter where Master meets Sri Yukteswar. In the first edition, the passage is "Who is my mother, who are my brothers.." suggesting, as PY left home to the Benares hermitage, simply that he was embracing a wider view of family. In the 8th edition, the passage was changed to "He who does not love me more than mother's and father's is not worthy of me." I'm pretty certain that an editor made that change, because in the 8th edition, the passage cited was wrong, and I don't think PY would have made that mistake.

Sometimes this even seems nit-picky to me, but I do not really think it is. If even a little footnote can be altered, to a passage that puts guilt on anyone not following a monastic path, when that does not at all seem to be the intent of the passage in earlier editions - then our entire view of Paramahansa Yogananda, as presented in later editions of the AY, is subject to both a "pasturizing" process, that tends to tone down his forceful language, and a tone that tends to create guilt in the reader, that he did not intend.

These are not trivial changes, and there must be far more of them than anyone has yet been able to count.

Edited by: ranger20 at: 10/27/03 9:24 am
ranger20
Registered User
(10/27/03 9:49 am)
Reply
Re: Information on the AY requested
Quote:
There could be a link to the original AY, as well as to subsequent editions, if people have them and want to post them on the internet.


I'd advise extreme caution here! You don't want to get on the wrong side of copyright laws. We should even check very carefully, the language that applies to "brief" quotes.

To post big chunks of any editions after the first would be a surefire way to draw the ire of the SRF legal team.

Edited by: ranger20 at: 10/27/03 9:50 am
AtThyFeet
Registered User
(8/5/05 7:32 am)
Reply
Re: Information on the AY requested
A good place to go is:
anandaindia.org/books/aut...index.html

Next Topic >>

Add Reply

Email This To a Friend Email This To a Friend
Topic Control Image Topic Commands
Click to receive email notification of replies Click to receive email notification of replies
Click to stop receiving email notification of replies Click to stop receiving email notification of replies
jump to:

- SRF Walrus - Letters to the Editor (cleared of identification!) -



Powered By ezboardŽ Ver. 7.32
Copyright Š1999-2005 ezboard, Inc.